Winning Tax Evasion Defense Attorney
David M. Garvin, Board Certified Tax Lawyer
Winning Tax Evasion Defense Attorney
David M. Garvin, Board Certified Tax Lawyer
Tax evasion defense attorney, David M. Garvin, is recognized by his peers for his knowledge, skill, and results. Mr. Garvin is a Florida Bar certified tax lawyer, has an LLM in Taxation and has been selected by "Super Lawyers" for 12 consecutive years. He has has been selected by "Best Lawyers in America" and is the two time winner of the prestigious Daily Business Review "Most Effective Lawyer" award, 2014 and 2010.
Mr. Garvin has an AVVO rating of "Superb" and a Martindale Hubbell rating of "AV", the highest rating. Tax evasion defense lawyer, David M. Garvin, has been consistently selected for inclusion in the "Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers". Mr. Garvin has concentrated on tax evasion defense for over 35 years and has compiled a remarkable list of trial victories. Representative cases are set forth below and can be found throughout this website.
Each case is different with unique facts. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results.
Before having an indepth discussion on tax evasion defense and the selection of a tax evasion defense lawyer, it is crucial that the taxpayer who is the target of the tax evasion charges understand the elements of the offense. The law against tax evasion is found in Title 26 of the United States Code in section 7201. The title of section 7201 is "Attempt to evade or defeat tax." Section 7201 provides that any person who willfully attempts to evade or defeat any tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26 of the United States Code) or the payment of such tax shall be guilty of a felony with a maximum penalty of up to 5 years.
The elements that the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt are:
The term willfulness presupposes the existence of a legal duty and knowledge of that duty. If a person acting in good faith misunderstands his duty he cannot be guilty of "willfully" evading those taxes.
The IRS develops tax evasion cases during an investigation. Trained Criminal Investigation Division special agents conduct the tax evasion investigation. The best tax evasion defense lawyers understand and avoid the pitfalls that arise during the investigation.
When taxpayers learn that they are the subject or target of a tax evasion investigation, their top priority is to kill the case. Often they seek advice from tax lawyers, who concentrate on civil tax disputes or tax planning, or lawyers who focus on criminal law but have virtually no formal education or experience in tax law or tax cases.
These well-meaning lawyers may suggest that the best way to "kill" an investigation is to amend and/or file tax returns and to cooperate with the special agents. However, experienced tax evasion defense lawyers know that once an investigation has been commenced, the decision whether to proceed with an indictment or to kill the case is primarily driven by the amount and quality of the evidence gathered by the special agents. A primary source of evidence is often the taxpayer himself.
Taxpayers should decline any request for an interview that would occur without their tax evasion defense attorney being present. Taxpayers should also resist the urge to file amended tax returns immediately. In some circumstances, the returns may be used as evidence against the taxpayer. A plan should be formulated with your tax evasion defense lawyer before any action is taken. This will help ensure that the benefits and hazards of any action have been adequately considered and analyzed before any decisions are made.
Not Guilty on All Counts
When Julio Rabiana, the former mayor of Hialeah, announced that he was a candidate to be elected the Mayor of Miami-Dade County, the polls showed that Mr. Robaina had an early lead. Then came the news from a certain television reporter that law enforcement had leaked that Mr. Robaina was under investigation for tax evasion and other matters.
The Mayor met with the agents and cooperated with the investigation. However, this did not resolve the case and in fact, only made matters worse. Mr. Robaina and his wife, Raiza, decided to retain Mr. Garvin to represent them at trial.
Observers of the high stakes trial stated that the criminal tax evasion defense attorney, David M. Garvin, masterfully presented the position of the Robainas. The Miami Herald summarized the trial as follows: "The Robainas' attorney, David Garvin is an accountant as well as a lawyer, an expert in tax law who outgunned the prosecution". - The Miami Herald. August 20, 2014.
Each case is different with unique facts. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results.
The DOJ Tax Division understands that criminal investigations that result in convictions enhance general voluntary compliance by all taxpayers. The DOJ Tax Division also understands that criminal cases that result in the taxpayer being not guilty on all counts do not enhance voluntary compliance by the taxpayer population. As a result, the IRS and the DOJ Tax Division place a great deal of emphasis on the quality and quantity of the evidence when deciding to authorize a particular case to be indicted.
It should also be noted that once a criminal tax investigation has commenced, the IRS believes that it is against its objective to encourage voluntary compliance for the IRS to accept payment from the taxpayer for the taxes that he should have paid before any investigation started, as a sufficient basis to kill a criminal tax evasion case.
The logic behind this position is if taxpayers can wait until they know that they are under investigation to pay the taxes that they have owed for years, no one would be encouraged to file and pay their taxes voluntarily. Taxpayers often offer to pay their back taxes when they learn of an investigation and are frustrated when they know that their offers have little effect on the investigation.
The best tax evasion defense lawyers know that criminal investigations should never be treated by the taxpayer or his representatives as a civil audit. It should be remembered that a special agent's job is to collect evidence to indict and convict the target of the investigation.
The special agents are trained to be friendly to get the taxpayer and witnesses to talk and provide them with the information they need to make a criminal case. However, they can also quickly become angry and intimidating to get the taxpayer or witness to talk if they determine that this is necessary to accomplish the job.
Perhaps the most critical factor in determining which lawyer to retain for a tax evasion case is the lawyer's experience and, in particular, the jury trial results of tax evasion cases the lawyer has handled. Representative cases of tax evasion by the defense attorney, David M. Garvin, are set forth below.
Each case is different with unique facts. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results.
Conspirators in a $40 million Ponzi scheme were arrested. They offered to testify against their CPA. At trial, the testimony of the prosecution witnesses did not hold up. The jury carefully listened to the defense presented by the lawyer for the CPA. Counsel for the CPA was able to show the contradictions in the testimony of the government's witnesses. On several occasions, the witnesses were caught in bald-faced lies.
The tax evasion defense lawyer was David M. Garvin. Observers described the defense presented by David M. Garvin as brilliant. The jury found the taxpayer not guilty on all counts.
Each case is different with unique facts. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results.
The IRS reports that it successfully obtained a conviction in over 93% of the cases that are indicted. The number of investigations initiated during 2013 was 5,314. The Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation Division (“CI”) is the only federal law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over federal tax crimes. A criminal tax case may take several years to investigate, indict, and go to trial. For 2015, CI again boasted the highest conviction rate in all of the federal law enforcement — 93.2%.
Found Not Guilty on All Counts
The IRS indicted a business executive for tax evasion. The tax evasion defense lawyer was David M. Garvin. During the trial, Mr. Garvin proved that the evidence presented by the IRS was untrustworthy and presented evidence that suggested that his client was innocent.
The jury agreed and rendered a NOT GUILTY verdict on all counts.
Each case is different with unique facts. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results.
Some people believe that lawyers are a commodity. In the view of these people, all attorneys are the same. However, this philosophy ignores that no two people are the same. It should follow that some artists are more talented than other artists, some singers are better than others, some doctors are better than others, and some lawyers are better than others.
This is particularly true in criminal tax defense cases. The government publishes statistics that reflect that the IRS obtains a conviction in over 90% of the criminal tax cases in which an indictment is returned. The statistics also reflect that less than 1% of all lawyers have won a criminal tax evasion trial for the defense.
Tax evasion is a criminal violation with a maximum sentence of up to 5 years of incarceration. Individuals who underreport their income or over-report their expenses to evade paying their income taxes are often charged with tax evasion. The IRS states that 90% of the individuals charged with tax evasion are convicted.
The willful failure to file a tax return on the due date, including extensions, is a tax crime under Section 7203 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 7203 states: Any person required under this title (Title 26. The Internal Revenue Code) to pay any estimated tax or tax or * * * to make a return, keep any records, or supply any information, who willfully fails to pay such estimated tax or tax, make such return, keep such records, or supply such information, at the time or times required by law or regulations, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $25,000 ($100,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than one year, or both, together with the costs of prosecution. In the case of a willful violation of any provision of section 6050I, the offense shall be a felony, not a misdemeanor, and the maximum imprisonment shall be five years.
Section 7203 provides that the willful failure to timely pay a tax is a misdemeanor. However, suppose intentional acts by the taxpayer accompanies the willful failure to pay the tax to conceal funds to prevent the IRS from learning of or collecting the funds. In that case, the taxpayer's willfully failing to pay the tax taken, together with willful acts of concealment of funds and/or other assets, may give rise to the tax evasion charge under Section 7201 of the Internal Revenue Code. The offense of tax evasion is a felony with a maximum term of imprisonment of 5 years.
You will be a convicted felon and sentenced by a federal judge. Typically, the sentence will include a period of incarceration. Unlike a civil audit, where the IRS is primarily interested in collecting taxes owed by the taxpayer, tax evasion is a criminal charge.
No. The special agents are highly trained, and when they arrive to speak with you, they already have identified issues they are interested in getting evidence to support. Taxpayers often agree to talk to the agents in an attempt to show that they have nothing to hide. This is a mistake.
The taxpayer should know that once a tax evasion investigation is commenced, the filing of amended tax returns will not be viewed as a voluntary act. The taxpayer is likely to get little benefit from filing an amended tax return. In fact, the IRS may try to use the tax return to help it prove intent and willfulness. A decision to amend should only be done after careful analysis with your tax evasion defense attorney.
The statute of limitations for most tax offenses is six years from the late of the date the false tax return was filed or the due date, including any applicable extensions. There are several exceptions to this rule.
The statutory maximum for Tax Evasion (Section 7201) is five years. The statutory maximum for filing a fraudulent tax return (Section 7206) is three years. The statutory maximum for willful failure to file a tax return (Section 7203) is one year. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines applicable to tax offenses are found in Section 2T1.